Posted By: Cecilia Kuklies  on Tuesday, December 18, 2007

The media tries to make us believe all sorts of fiction about the candidates and the war and everything.  They are such control freaks.

Posted By: Ted Holcomb  on Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Thank goodness people are starting to wake up about Billary.

Posted By: Steve D.  on Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Yep, Hillary be hurt'en in some  minor states, but apparently hold'en strong in the major.  Perhaps that will change too?  Wonder how many entering Obama's camp are really Republicans hoping the once viewed invincible Hillary doesn't run against their guy?  No matter what, she is on the defensive, which is not a winning strategy.  What she needs is 3 or 4 key issues to talk about.  Tell us why these issues are important to America and how she will make positive changes.  Perhaps choose something about the economy, foreign relations, the wars in the middle east, illegal aliens, excessive federal spending, raising health care cost, or education.   Show us what a leader can do to bring about positive change in these areas benefitting all Americans, rather that explaining why something happened in the past.   If she doesn’t adopt such a strategy, we’ll probably end up with a continuation of the highly ineffective and repugnant Bush administration.

Posted By: TA Duncan  on Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Souldn't the discussion be about, "Do we want our Commander in Chief to be someone who does drugs," and not about whether or not he or she is ELECTABLE?  Is the President required to undergo unannounced drug testing as everyone else who has access to nuclear weapons is?  If we can find tens of thousands of young people who have never used drugs to become the people we trust to guard, maintain, and ultimately be responsible for launching nuclear weapons, why can't we find candidates for the presidency who have a clean history?  I don't accept that, "everyone does it!"  As a military officer who was charged with the care and safety of nuclear weapons, I know better.  If you can't find an honest candidate, should we nominate a dishonest one?  Where are our values going?

Posted By: RLG  on Tuesday, December 18, 2007

If you are looking for a President that has never used drugs it seems a little late in the game. Both of the last two Presidents have and it didn't stop them from being elected. Stop the PORK BARREL spending and the me, me, me attitude of Congress would be a step in the right direction. Republicans have been spending and the Democrats want to raise our taxes so they can continue the spending. In both cases WE LOSE!!

Posted By: what now toons  on Tuesday, December 18, 2007

I'm not suprised.  Her campain has been puffed up by the coporate media.  In one on one polls, Edwards beats the Republican canidates by more than twice the margin of hillary or Obama.  So why is the media ignoring Edwards.  Maybe because he is a real Democrat, not Republican lite,and taking coporate money.

www.whatnowtoons.com

Posted By: jack ludwig aka vox publicuss disgustus  on Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Another balloon comment:

"Oh my! Her water's broken and she's giving birth to a losing campaign"



Of course that's only one O'Bama supporter's opinion. Up the Irish!