Posted By: geoff  on Wednesday, June 18, 2008

I dunno. Both Clintons - Chelsea too, for that matter - still draw the crowds when they visit other countries, whereas some people like Henry Kissinger are afraid to be arrested for war crimes. Does the first President Bush ever visit anyone other than his old oil buddies in the Persian Gulf?

Posted By: thomas  on Friday, June 20, 2008

Uhh.. yeah.  I don't get it.  Clinton and Bush creating the same mess?  Not even close, nice try linking Clinton to Bush's fiasco.  I agree with Geoff, the only pace Dubya seems to frequent is some branch of the American military.  Not a good sign for a president in terms of legacy.

Posted By: patsy  on Wednesday, June 25, 2008

I'm not sure I get it.  Can it actually be equating the devestation wreaked on this country by this train wreck of an administration with ANYTHING the Clintons managed? Does this equate lies about sex with lies that caused a war and countless casualties, including our Constitution?

Posted By: Mikey  on Thursday, June 26, 2008

I get it. Well done, Huffaker. The forked tongues on B&H and Bush's hands (which are feet, if you actually looked.) say it all to me and actually sums up the whole situation quite well. If you three posters above could step out of your I-hate-Bush-no-matter-what and your misled worship of B&H for half a second, you'd see it exactly. Especially YOU, Pasty. Put down your regurgitated lefty rhetoric for a second and, as Bill O'rielly would say, "wise up". (Nope, you can't call me righty either. I'm voting Obama.)

Posted By: sra  on Thursday, June 26, 2008

I also don't get it. Especially the snake tongues. Not quite sure what the artist is trying to say. I mean, the Clinton administration (for the most part) left America in a pretty good way (ESPECIALLY if you juxtapose it with Bush's tenure).

Posted By: Lyn Cisneros  on Saturday, June 28, 2008

Are you kidding? This cartooninst is just nuts.

Posted By: Victor Powell  on Sunday, June 29, 2008

Maybe the cartoonist means (the tongues of the Clintons) they lie like snakes! NOT SURE, but I DO find this refreshing that someone finally places both a Democrat AND Republican in a negative way the same way.

Posted By: Pat  on Friday, September 05, 2008

If Bush had been half the leader Clinton was, we could bid him a fond farewell, instead of a Thank God he's gone.  If a government surplus and peace are bad legacies, then I guess Clinton is guilty.