Detroit Automakers A Relic Of The Past
Celebrity Fires Consume the Media
To Battle Stations
Failure To Blow Election Stuns Democratic Party Faithful Mourn End To Losing Tradition
Looking Past Palin
The Earth’s Not Flat and It’s Not Warming
A Force For Good -- But Not At State
Palin Saboteurs Want to Kill Her Career Now
As GM Goes, So Goes The GOP
Happy Thanksgiving
Quantum Of Nonsense
Obama's School Choice
And They're Off
Time To ReassessThe Iraq War?
Erbe: Liberals,Get A Grip
Leaving Home
From Victim To Victor In Black America
They Gave All, For . . . This?
'No' To Obama'S Experimental Government
Failure Is Not An Option
Weekly Review
Keeping Cool Over Joe Lieberman
Leaders Duck And Hide While Wall Street Steals From Us
Obama's Call To Service Meets The Economic Meltdown
A Bridge We Need
Trusting Paulson
The Secret Of Happiness
History Is Screaming
'Keynsian Moment' Needed To Fight 'Great Recession'
A Lemon Of A Bailout
For Obama, A Game Of High-Stakes Fiscal Poker
No One Should Be Railin' Or Bailin' On Palin
Must Obama 'Discipline' Democrats?
A Warrior Departs: 'Tell Them My Story'
The Insane Rage Of The Same-Sex Marriage Mob
Sarah Palin Is Not The Future Of The GOP
Walking On Sunshine
Hillary Appointment: The Audacity Of Broken Promises
GOP Needs Night Of The Long Knives
Obama's Washington
The New World Financial Order
A Bomb Thrower Vs. Obama Bashers
Let'S Hope Gop Will Give Us SomeThing To Vote For Rather Than Against
Is Gay The New Black?
DiscriminaTion Still Lives
The Truth about Government
Quo Vadis GOP
Sunset For The Old White Guys
Note To Gop: Get Serious About Women Candidates
Revenge Of The Boxes
Change We Can Bank On
Let Them Eat Spam
Choices Have Consequences -- Unless You're Joe Lieberman
Dean: Dems 'Big Tent' Party Now
Don't Bail Out the Big 3 -- Interview With Dan Ikenson
The Other Deficit
Blind Defense of Koran Abrogates Reality
Some Of My Best Friends Are…
In Detroit, Failure's a Done Deal
Evil Concealed By Money
The Clinton Gamble



Lambro180.jpg
Obama's Tax Cuts Look Like 'Welfare,' Critics
Say
Donald Lambro 10/14/2008
Digg This Story!
Del.icio.us Reddit StumbleUpon Yahoo! MyWeb Technorati Google Bookmarks Furl Ma.gnolia Newsvine Bloglines Rojo Facebook
WASHINGTON -- Barack Obama has a disturbing habit of saying things that are not true, such as no one who makes less than $250,000 will pay higher taxes under his tax plans.

He is running saturation ads around the country saying this, but the fact is that lots of people will be paying higher taxes beneath that income level (which will raise the top marginal tax rate from 35 percent to nearly 40 percent). In fact, millions of Americans who now pay no income taxes will get "refundable" checks from the government under his plan (but more on that in a minute).

The liberal senator would raise capital-gains tax rates on the sale of stocks or other assets on the gain in their value when they're sold. That would mean higher taxes on millions of American families preparing for their retirement.

He'd raise taxes on dividends, too, that would impose higher taxes on Americans whose income depends on those hard-earned dividends.

If you run a small business that earns $250,000 or more and you pay taxes on its earnings as an individual taxpayer (though you pay yourself less than that), you will be hit by his higher income tax.

His plan proposes to get rid of a lot of corporate tax "loopholes," which would mean higher taxes that would be passed
on to their customers who make a lot less than $250,000.

But the most disingenuous part of his tax plan is his claim that he will give 95 percent of all American workers a "tax cut," because he does not mention that it will mean sending checks to millions of tax filers who pay no personal income taxes.

Critics say that looks "suspiciously like welfare" or income redistribution from wealthier taxpayers to lower-income Americans. But it also raises the question, How can he call it a "tax cut" when its recipients pay no income taxes?

Under his "Making Work Pay" income tax cut for low- to middle-income people, he will give a "refundable" $500 tax credit to low- to middle-income workers or $1,000 to couples. It would begin to phase out at $75,000 for individuals and $150,000 for a couple.

But because he makes it "refundable," he will pay the equivalent amount to those who have no income-tax liability after taking the usual tax credits and deductions in the tax code. Those checks would come from taxes to be paid by higher-income Americans.

The Internal Revenue Service says nearly 46 million tax filers -- one-third of all filers -- had no tax liability in 2006, so you can hardly call this a tax cut because they pay no taxes.

Add Feed to ZapTXT Add Feed to Bloglines Add Feed to Technorati Add Feed to LibWorm! Add Feed to My Yahoo! Add Feed to Google Add Feed to Newsgator Add Feed to Rojo Add Feed to Windows Live Add Feed to My MSN
This will cause some shrinkage
By Eric Allie - Caglecartoons.com * Posted 6/27/2007 12:00:00 AM
Post to MySpace!
Comment
Email
This will cause some shrinkage
© Copyright 2007  Eric Allie - All Rights Reserved.

Posted By: Jeff  on Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Geesussah, Donald, what a chunk of stupidity you are!  What would you know about "welfare"??  You only parrot the words of ignorance to which you have chosen to attach yourself and which I have been hearing from intellectual eunuchs like you since the 1950s.  Grow up.  Brighten up.

Take a laxative.  Sonething!

Posted By: fencerider rob  on Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Thank you Donald for your honesty, regardless of how many will label you for doing so. Jeff, please enlighten us to your saviour's tax cuts and how they will affect us 95%. NOTHING to say? Very much like BHO's accomplishments. Again, what has he done to deserve your adoration or better yet our votes?

Make A Comment
We appreciate your feedback. Post a comment using the form below.
Your Name (required)
Your Comments
Type the characters you see in the image:
 





© Cagle Cartoons, Inc., All Rights Reserved; Artwork and Columns © each respective artist and writer.