Detroit Automakers A Relic Of The Past
Celebrity Fires Consume the Media
To Battle Stations
Failure To Blow Election Stuns Democratic Party Faithful Mourn End To Losing Tradition
Looking Past Palin
The Earth’s Not Flat and It’s Not Warming
A Force For Good -- But Not At State
Palin Saboteurs Want to Kill Her Career Now
As GM Goes, So Goes The GOP
Happy Thanksgiving
Quantum Of Nonsense
Obama's School Choice
And They're Off
Time To ReassessThe Iraq War?
Erbe: Liberals,Get A Grip
Leaving Home
From Victim To Victor In Black America
They Gave All, For . . . This?
'No' To Obama'S Experimental Government
Failure Is Not An Option
Weekly Review
Keeping Cool Over Joe Lieberman
Leaders Duck And Hide While Wall Street Steals From Us
Obama's Call To Service Meets The Economic Meltdown
A Bridge We Need
Trusting Paulson
The Secret Of Happiness
History Is Screaming
'Keynsian Moment' Needed To Fight 'Great Recession'
A Lemon Of A Bailout
For Obama, A Game Of High-Stakes Fiscal Poker
No One Should Be Railin' Or Bailin' On Palin
Must Obama 'Discipline' Democrats?
A Warrior Departs: 'Tell Them My Story'
The Insane Rage Of The Same-Sex Marriage Mob
Sarah Palin Is Not The Future Of The GOP
Walking On Sunshine
Hillary Appointment: The Audacity Of Broken Promises
GOP Needs Night Of The Long Knives
Obama's Washington
The New World Financial Order
A Bomb Thrower Vs. Obama Bashers
Let'S Hope Gop Will Give Us SomeThing To Vote For Rather Than Against
Is Gay The New Black?
DiscriminaTion Still Lives
The Truth about Government
Quo Vadis GOP
Sunset For The Old White Guys
Note To Gop: Get Serious About Women Candidates
Revenge Of The Boxes
Change We Can Bank On
Let Them Eat Spam
Choices Have Consequences -- Unless You're Joe Lieberman
Dean: Dems 'Big Tent' Party Now
Don't Bail Out the Big 3 -- Interview With Dan Ikenson
The Other Deficit
Blind Defense of Koran Abrogates Reality
Some Of My Best Friends Are…
In Detroit, Failure's a Done Deal
Evil Concealed By Money
The Clinton Gamble



Hillary Can't Fix What Her Party Broke
Froma Harrop 8/28/2008
Digg This Story!
Del.icio.us Reddit StumbleUpon Yahoo! MyWeb Technorati Google Bookmarks Furl Ma.gnolia Newsvine Bloglines Rojo Facebook

DENVER — Hillary Clinton just gave the last major speech of her 2008 campaign. Or perhaps was it the first of her 2012 campaign. She said vote-for-Barack enough times and at enough volume to protect her from accusations of trying to sabotage Obama's chances in November, not that she won't be accused.

But the address at the Democrats' convention was a campaign speech — for her. It was about health care, women's struggles and other signature Hillary issues. To her diehard supporters who have yet to come home to Obama, she said: "I want you to ask yourselves. Were you in the campaign just for me?"

That's the giveaway line, because for Hillary's angry backers, the issue is no longer what was done to her. It was about what was done to them.

Democrats had turned on fellow Democrats, and although the arrows flew in all directions, the nastiest of the invective fell on the ladies who loved Hillary. That these loyal Democrats had been targeted made them nuts.

I spent the morning at the Denver headquarters of PUMA PAC, perhaps the best known of the anti-Obama Democratic groups. PUMA stands for People United Means Action, according to the acronym's polite version. It was founded by Darragh Murphy, a 39-year-old blogger from Boston, who had been flamed once too often while praising Clinton on the left-wing Daily
Kos Website.

How strange that anyone writing for a political site would be smeared for backing a candidate of the same party. If the Democratic leadership had any sense of self-preservation, it would have shunned creepy bloggers and those who provided their forum. Instead, it hailed them as voices of the new generation.

"What will your members do when Hillary tells them to vote for Obama?" I asked Murphy.

"They will not vote for Obama," she replied.

"I can tell you that."

Whether they will vote for John McCain is another matter. Murphy herself has not decided what she'll do in November.

PUMA spokeswoman Shannon Rains is closer to going over to McCain. "I've been voting for 20 years," the 39-year-old from Salisbury, Md., told me. "I've never ever looked at a Republican candidate. I am now."

The Democrats clearly have a hooligan problem. It was as though their left-wingers suffered a kind of Karl Rove envy. They wanted to go on the attack, demonize a Clinton and hurl abuse at the Clinton's friends. Only a year ago, Vanity Fair ran a cover story on how Clinton hatred had infected much of the right wing. The left seems to have grabbed the baton. And it apparently did not dawn on the Obama shock troops that they were offending the very people their man might someday need.

Add Feed to ZapTXT Add Feed to Bloglines Add Feed to Technorati Add Feed to LibWorm! Add Feed to My Yahoo! Add Feed to Google Add Feed to Newsgator Add Feed to Rojo Add Feed to Windows Live Add Feed to My MSN
Clinton Party Of Two
By John Darkow - Columbia Daily Tribune, Missouri * Posted 8/21/2008 12:00:00 AM
Post to MySpace!
Comment
Email
Clinton Party Of Two
© Copyright 2008  John Darkow - All Rights Reserved.

Posted By: Leslie DeVane  on Monday, September 01, 2008

I think the ladies at PUMA have hit the nail right on the head.  The party leadership aided Hillary's supporters being called everything that these bloggers could lay their hands too by their constant sniping at Hillary for a negative campaign that was tearing the party apart.  Maureen Dowd commentaries in the NYTimes constantly derided her supporters as shoulder pad wearing feminists, feminazis, bitter Clintonistas and the worst of all charges racists.  I blame the party for the disunity not the candidate.  Politics is politics and Obama got off scot free on everything he did during the primaries. I particularly loved how Jessie Jackson Jr got up and praised LBJ at the convention for his help in passing the Civil Rights Bill when they bashed Hillary for the suggestion as racists and demeaning Dr King's legacy. I heard over and over that the party needed the young voters. That they were the future of the party.  This party forgot their long time supporters and financial backers from the grassroots. I have voted a straight Democratic ticket since I began voting in 1972 but I will no longer be loyal to a party that would not even count by vote here in Florida until they could give it to Obama.  I have made up my mind with what I will do in November.  I will teach the party and Obama's faithful that their is a price to pay when the voters are shut out of the process by party leaders in favor of their candidate of choice.  I feel that the pledge delegates were used as weapons against Hillary as well and as long as this party uses them to determine the nominee I will not vote for this party again.  I may never vote Republican again either but this year my vote is my voice that I will not be pushed around by any party and my vote will be counted this fall and it will not be given to Barack Obama.  If he wins this fall it will be without me and I will not vote for his re-election either.  This candidate is as invisible to me as I was in the process during the primaries.


Posted By: Beth Somogyi in FL  on Monday, September 01, 2008

Yes leslie my sentiments exactly! The Democrats have certainly taken DEMOCRACY out of this election. I am not "bitter", "racist" or "feminazis". Had Obama won by a landslide I might have been able to fall in line-but it was the non-standard rules and tactics of the delegates and the DNC that chose this candidate. Obama received the nomination with the help from delegates that did not even vote with their constituents. My vote is MY vote and it won't be given to a Democrat again until the DNC revisits the rules and provides fair representation to all.


Posted By: Good Life  on Monday, September 01, 2008

Did Hillary not know that the election could go beyond "Super Tuesday"?  Did Hillary not know there were caucus states?  Did Florida and Michigan not know the rules?  Do you tell your children their are usually no consequences of breaking rules? Go ahead and break the rules if you don's like them.  Should rules be ignored?  If you want the rules changed next time, fine, go for it.  But everyone knew the rules for 4 years.   Do you understand that you are saying that a woman wasn't good enough to play by the rules so we should change the rules to aid the poor, weak, emotional, PMS or hot flashing, female compete with the big mean males? What would you be saying if Hillary won and all of the Obama supporters refused to vote for her because the rules obviously aided her?  We are a nation of laws and rules.  If you wanted the rules changed why didn't you lobby 4 years ago?  Do you understand what the attitude, "My team didn't win so I want to retroactively change the rules" is doing to the woman's movement?  

Do you understand how this is feeding a stereotype that I've seen women fight for over 40 years?   Do you know how you are convincing more and more people that those stereotypes are more than correct?  Do you understand what that stereotype will do to the next woman that has a chance?


Posted By: Leslie DeVane  on Monday, September 01, 2008

Pray tell then Good Life, why did the delegates not stay out of the primary until the voters had their say.  Those be the rules honey. They had the right to vote during the convention but they just keep jumping on the Obama wagon to stall Hillary's momentum. I am aware as was Hillary was that the votes continued after Super Tuesday and she was trying to run her campaign to the finish line but she had to do so with Dean, Pelosi the DNC and other party leaders screaming that she had to end her campaign.  Is that in the rule book.  He didn't have enough delegates to win either without the help of the delegates jumping to him. Those are the rules too.  I hate to tell you but the rules adding Nevada & SC were not changed four years ago.  I only pray that one day people like you vote and your vote is discarded into the trash bin as mine was then maybe you can relate but until that happens I have a right to feel the way that I do and I will use my vote as I choose.  I want to be treated fairly and have the candidate that I choose treated fairly and you have to be an Obamanut to feel that this process was fair.  Sounds to me like you might be a little worried for Obama and Biden now.  Well you folks should have thought about that before you insulted us during the primary season and continue to insult our intelligence now.  You can bet the bank on this one. If Obama had won Florida the party would have moved heaven and earth to amend the rules to give him those votes during the primary.  He wouldn't have had to wait until the rules committee meeting in June to get them either.


Posted By: Good Life  on Monday, September 01, 2008

Leslie--The super delegates can declare whenever they want.  They are not tied to the end of the primaries.  That is the rule.  Hillary had super delegates declare for her before the beginning much less the end.  Hillary could have saved some money for after Super Tuesday.  She did not.  That hamstrung the rest of her effort.  She could have organized in the caucus states and stopped that long run of Obama wins.  She did not.  That gave an impression of inevitability to Obama which caused a "bandwagon effect".  People jump in line with whoever looks like a winner.  Hillary started out with that bandwagon.  In the beginning all of the party leaders were telling the others to back off and channeling money to Hillary.  That's why she had more "big money" donors.  The "bosses" were telling the big money that Hillary would win so put their money on her.  The voters and small donors changed that scenario not the leaders.  Hillary could have done the math as others did.  She did not.  She took a chance that a miracle would happen.  It did not.  Most of my life I lived in a state where my vote didn't count.  I still voted for my best interests even though the people around me were voting against their best interests.  

You certainly have the right to feel however you want and have the right to vote for whoever you want.  And the rest of the people have the right to conclude that this is how a woman thinks and acts.  Not only in politics but also in life in general.  


Posted By: Leslie DeVane  on Monday, September 01, 2008

Good Life, get a life.  Do you enjoy going through your life casting judgements on women and how they behave and what others people think of them. Perhaps this is why you do not like Hillary and did not vote for her.  Simply because she is an irrational woman. I beg to defer that voting for John McCain is against my best interests or anyone elses.  Did you ever hear of checks and balances. If John McCain does win and the Democrats win with the majority they are touting they can dominate the issues and legislation.  They can also cut funding of the war in Iraq. Let us just see if they will put up or shut up.  They will have the power to override the veto of John McCain.  If you think you can guilt people with the lame old think of your country and your fellow Americans you can save yourself the trouble.  This country survived 8 years of George Bush and will survive 4 years of Obama or McCain.  Don't worry wonder boy is  going to win isn't he?  He was the best candidate and there is no way he can lose now isn't that right?  He is just brilliant. If you don't believe me ask Oprah.  Oh that might not satify you either after all she is just another woman.  



PS: In regards to what some narrow minded sexist thinks I could care less.  This will be my last word on the subject genius.


Posted By: Good Life  on Monday, September 01, 2008

Now if you would have started with a "balance of power" argument no one would question your "why".

Make A Comment
We appreciate your feedback. Post a comment using the form below.
Your Name (required)
Your Comments
Type the characters you see in the image:

 
Please contact your local newspaper editor if you would like to see the Froma Harrop column in your hometown paper.