Detroit Automakers A Relic Of The Past
Celebrity Fires Consume the Media
To Battle Stations
Failure To Blow Election Stuns Democratic Party Faithful Mourn End To Losing Tradition
Looking Past Palin
The Earth’s Not Flat and It’s Not Warming
A Force For Good -- But Not At State
Palin Saboteurs Want to Kill Her Career Now
As GM Goes, So Goes The GOP
Happy Thanksgiving
Quantum Of Nonsense
Obama's School Choice
And They're Off
Time To ReassessThe Iraq War?
Erbe: Liberals,Get A Grip
Leaving Home
From Victim To Victor In Black America
They Gave All, For . . . This?
'No' To Obama'S Experimental Government
Failure Is Not An Option
Weekly Review
Keeping Cool Over Joe Lieberman
Leaders Duck And Hide While Wall Street Steals From Us
Obama's Call To Service Meets The Economic Meltdown
A Bridge We Need
Trusting Paulson
The Secret Of Happiness
History Is Screaming
'Keynsian Moment' Needed To Fight 'Great Recession'
A Lemon Of A Bailout
For Obama, A Game Of High-Stakes Fiscal Poker
No One Should Be Railin' Or Bailin' On Palin
Must Obama 'Discipline' Democrats?
A Warrior Departs: 'Tell Them My Story'
The Insane Rage Of The Same-Sex Marriage Mob
Sarah Palin Is Not The Future Of The GOP
Walking On Sunshine
Hillary Appointment: The Audacity Of Broken Promises
GOP Needs Night Of The Long Knives
Obama's Washington
The New World Financial Order
A Bomb Thrower Vs. Obama Bashers
Let'S Hope Gop Will Give Us SomeThing To Vote For Rather Than Against
Is Gay The New Black?
DiscriminaTion Still Lives
The Truth about Government
Quo Vadis GOP
Sunset For The Old White Guys
Note To Gop: Get Serious About Women Candidates
Revenge Of The Boxes
Change We Can Bank On
Let Them Eat Spam
Choices Have Consequences -- Unless You're Joe Lieberman
Dean: Dems 'Big Tent' Party Now
Don't Bail Out the Big 3 -- Interview With Dan Ikenson
The Other Deficit
Blind Defense of Koran Abrogates Reality
Some Of My Best Friends Are…
In Detroit, Failure's a Done Deal
Evil Concealed By Money
The Clinton Gamble



Kondracke180.jpg
McCain Is Right To 'Go Negative' -- But Needs
Positive
Morton Kondracke 8/14/2008
Digg This Story!
Del.icio.us Reddit StumbleUpon Yahoo! MyWeb Technorati Google Bookmarks Furl Ma.gnolia Newsvine Bloglines Rojo Facebook

Contrary to all the flak he's taking for it, Sen. John McCain has every right to "go negative" on Sen. Barack Obama -- but he'd better firm up his positive message, too.

McCain has been making a case that lower corporate taxes will create "jobs for America" and that "all of the above," including nuclear power and offshore drilling, is the way to go on energy. But he's still short of enunciating a comprehensive vision to compete with Obama's.

Meantime, his jabbing at Obama's "celebrity," and using images of Paris Hilton and Britney Spears in TV ads, was juvenile. But it was scarcely "racist" or "Rovian," as many critics charged.

It has become standard among Democrats to accuse Republicans of "smearing" or "sliming" their candidates whenever the GOP goes negative.

"Willy Horton," "Swift Boat" and "Karl Rove" are shorthand for Democratic accusations, and the words alone are widely accepted as proof of GOP dirty tricks.

Republicans certainly did exploit 1988 Democratic candidate Michael Dukakis' furlough of convicted murderer Willie Horton, but it is a fact that Horton committed rape and assault after his release, reinforcing doubts about Dukakis' stance on crime.

In 2004, the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth did have a legitimate beef against Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., who, as an antiwar
veteran, once charged that atrocities were routinely committed by U.S. troops in Vietnam.

And while somebody surely inspired underhanded attacks on McCain in South Carolina in 2000, on Sen. Max Cleland, D-Ga., in 2002 and on 2006 Tennessee Senate candidate Rep. Harold Ford Jr. (D), no one has ever established that Rove, political guru to George W. Bush, was responsible.

In fact, of all the negative ads run in recent elections, the worst actually was run against Bush in 2000, in which the NAACP charged that the then-Texas governor's veto of a hate crimes bill was tantamount to condoning a racist murder.

In this year's election, neither McCain nor Obama has been anywhere near as raw -- and, hopefully, won't be. Each has hit below the belt, though.

McCain charged that Obama "would lose a war to win an election." Obama's policies would have lost the Iraq War, but McCain can't prove they were politically motivated.

McCain charged that during Obama's trip to Europe, he chose to play basketball rather than visit wounded troops, whereas the circumstances of Obama's choice are actually complicated and murky.

Meantime, Obama falsely charged that McCain wanted to conduct a "100 years war" in Iraq and that Republicans would use race as an issue against him, which McCain has never done.

Add Feed to ZapTXT Add Feed to Bloglines Add Feed to Technorati Add Feed to LibWorm! Add Feed to My Yahoo! Add Feed to Google Add Feed to Newsgator Add Feed to Rojo Add Feed to Windows Live Add Feed to My MSN
Obama Do the Math Color
By Daryl Cagle - MSNBC.com * Posted 8/5/2008 12:00:00 AM
Post to MySpace!
Comment
Email
Obama Do the Math Color
© Copyright 2008  Daryl Cagle - All Rights Reserved.

Posted By: JTatEHT  on Saturday, August 16, 2008

John McCain not only has the right to go negative; he has the obligation to go negative. How else can the American people truly measure the content of his character? No wait! That is unfair. McCain is clearly losing it. He is not going negative; it is the lobbyists, who control his campaign. The decent John McCain, who denounced the swift-boaters in 2004, would never put up with some of these ads. The decent John McCain, whom Karl Rove, in 2000, accused of having a black baby, would not look so befuddled and would not say “lighten up” when questioned about those ads. Where is our maverick? He is being negated and destroyed by those who once hated him.


Posted By: geoff  on Saturday, August 16, 2008

JTatEHT: He sold out. Or flip-flopped. Or... just forgot. PMS? Didn't get his afternoon nap? or his Geritol?


Posted By: geoff  on Sunday, August 17, 2008

Tax cuts: it seems a lot of big corporations manage not to pay a lot of their taxes anyway, exploiting lots of loopholes, etc. So how much more can be "cut"? And how will infrastructure - roads (highway bridges that have started falling down), electricity grid, levees on the Mississippi, schools, the mortgage system, etc., etc., etc., be rebuilt without with a massive deficit and no more money? Or is there going to be some kind of "peace dividend" after Iraq & Afghanistan?


Posted By: dEdGrimley  on Sunday, August 17, 2008

As much as I'd like to agree with you, JT, I'm afraid there are 8 little words that negate your case: "I'm John McCain, and I approve this message."



I still have hope that there's some good left in Johnny Mac, but it seems his campaign is more about winning the election, than being the right guy for the job.


Posted By: Jeremy  on Monday, August 18, 2008

No one has an obligation nor a reason to go negative. There is too much mud-slinging from both sides. Let the press do their jobs, which is to find out the backgrounds of the two candidates. If the mainstream media won't do that job, let it be given to people who will...independent media and the news blogs that are willing to do work to find out the truth. Politicians should concentrate on what they're going to do with their responsibility of power, not what their opponent has or hasn't done.

Make A Comment
We appreciate your feedback. Post a comment using the form below.
Your Name (required)
Your Comments
Type the characters you see in the image:

 





© Cagle Cartoons, Inc., All Rights Reserved; Artwork and Columns © each respective artist and writer.