Posted By: geoff on Wednesday, July 02, 2008
Pretty sexist there: "manly" McCain (I knew he's got a brilliant new career selling Cialis if he doesn't get elected) vs. the "virginal" Obama (at least you didn't try to make him out to be Muslim, just Catholic).How do you actually know how McCain stood up under torture? Were you there?
Posted By: Good Life on Wednesday, July 02, 2008
So by Tony's arguments Kerry should have been elected rather than GW. Isn't it interesting how arguments change when your man has or hasn't the ribbons and experience that goes with them.
Posted By: jack sprat on Wednesday, July 02, 2008
Tony, you forgot the successful bombing of the Chinese embassy, I think probably having obama run against say, Kerry, would make him a better choice. Lacking any real experience except learning the Chicago hand shake for politicians, my hand from yours. While feathering the nest of a now convicted developer, isn’t a great resume builder for Commander in Cheese, when compared to the guy with the pic in the hall of shame in Ho Chi Minh City and meeting with the enemy to negotiate terms or work with them, while “active duty” (just a minuet let me see where’s my dictionary, what does it say here about “traitor”?) Now we add the whole, shooting the wounded teen when he was running (by golly, that is against the Geneva Conventions). Yep, I’d go with him, here we go I support your guy Obama in ’04! Cuz I’m for the guy whose friend are crooks over the guy whose friends were killing Americans. As for Kerry, should have gone to England with Clinton, or was that Gore?